Jesus and the Sacred Art of Humor: A Theological Exploration Through the Great Theorists of Mirth
I invite you into a conversation that may feel, at first, a little surprising. We are quite comfortable speaking of Jesus as healer and teacher, as prophet, priest, and crucified Lord. We know how to talk about his compassion, his courage, his suffering, and his resurrection. But we speak far less often of Jesus as a man of sharp wit, subtle irony, playful reversal—a man whose words could make people smile even as they squirmed under the truth.
Yet the Gospels are full of that side of him. His images are sometimes vivid to the point of absurdity. His parables are full of comic turns. His teaching often pierces pretension with the precision and timing of a good punchline. If the incarnation really means that the Word became flesh—not a thin, reduced slice of humanity, but the full weight and wonder of it—then surely Jesus’ sense of humor is part of the truth of who he is.
What I would like to do with you is to look at Jesus’ humor through the lens of those who have thought hardest about humor itself: philosophers, psychologists, anthropologists, literary theorists, theologians. Think of this as a kind of guided tour. We will walk through a gallery of major theories of humor and, in each room, we will ask: What does this help us see about Jesus? Not Jesus as entertainer, but Jesus whose wit, irony, and playful imagination reveal the heart of God.
We begin, as so often, with the Greeks. Aristotle uses a rather wonderful word, eutrapelia, which we might translate as “wittiness,” but he means something more than a quick tongue. For him, there is a virtue in the right kind of humor—a middle way between the boor who never laughs and the buffoon who will say anything for a cheap laugh. Good humor, in Aristotle’s world, is a social good. It shows moral maturity. It requires judgment, a sense of timing, and respect for others.
When Jesus looks at his religious opponents and says, “You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel,” you can almost imagine Aristotle nodding in approval. That is virtuous wit. He exposes a real spiritual problem—obsessing over tiny ritual details while ignoring great injustices—but he does so with a vivid, comic image that sticks in the imagination. It is truth told with a twinkle, a holy jest that clarifies rather than simply wounds.
Plato, on the other hand, is wary of laughter. He worries that humor is rooted in a sense of superiority, that it masks our own insecurity, that it can easily become cruel. Much later thinkers will follow him in that suspicion. Plato provides a useful warning: humor can be a weapon, and a sharp one. Jesus, however, offers us a counter-example. His humor is never directed against the vulnerable. He does not mock the poor, or the sick, or the broken. His jokes and jabs are always aimed up the social ladder, never down. He challenges those whose pride has already injured others. In that sense, he stands as a living rebuttal to Plato’s worst fears. Humor does not have to be demeaning. In his hands, it can be revelatory.
Almost all later theories of humor can be grouped into three great families, and each of them can shed some light on the way Jesus makes people laugh and think at the same time. The first is what is sometimes called the “superiority theory,” associated with Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes describes laughter as “a sudden glory,” by which he means the quick delight we feel when we find ourselves, in some way, above someone else—smarter, safer, more in the know. A great deal of satire works exactly this way.
What is striking, though, is how little of Jesus’ humor fits that description. There is nothing in him of the sneer, the smirk, the smug laugh from the back row. He does not make sport of the weak. When he does ridicule, it is directed at those invested in their own moral or religious superiority. If anything, his humor tends to reverse superiority: the proud are brought down; the lowly are lifted; the last become first. The joke is often on those who assumed they were at the center of God’s story.
The second family of theories is called “relief theory,” and here the most famous name is Freud. For him, humor functions like a psychological release valve. We laugh to let internal pressure escape. Jokes permit us to express, carefully and indirectly, what would otherwise be too charged to handle. Humor protects the psyche, loosens the knots of anxiety, and helps us bear things that might otherwise overwhelm us.
Seen through this lens, some of Jesus’ darker, more ironic sayings take on a new depth. When he speaks of “taking up the cross” while he himself is walking steadily toward Jerusalem, there is a kind of gallows humor in it—a clear-eyed, unflinching realism that refuses to deny what is coming, yet refuses to be mastered by fear. It is not flippant; it is not escapist. It is the wry courage of someone wholly given over to God. His humor, in other words, is psychologically whole. It comes from a place of integration, not fragmentation.
The third great family is the “incongruity theory,” associated with thinkers like Kant and Schopenhauer. Here the essence of humor lies in surprise, in the clash between what we expect and what actually appears. Something in the pattern breaks, and we laugh at the mismatch. Incongruity may be the single most helpful lens for reading Jesus’ teaching. “The last shall be first.” “A mustard seed becomes a tree.” A Samaritan, of all people, becomes the hero of the story. A widow shames a corrupt judge. A shepherd leaves ninety-nine sheep to look for one. These are engineered incongruities. The stories turn our expectations inside out. The punchline, if you like, is the kingdom of God.
Modern psychology adds still more nuance. Viktor Frankl, reflecting on his experience in the concentration camps, wrote that humor is “another of the soul’s weapons in the fight for survival.” When everything else is stripped away, the ability to laugh—at oneself, at the absurdity of cruelty, at the pretensions of power—can be a way of claiming a small but real freedom. If we read the Gospels with that in mind, Jesus’ humor in the shadow of his suffering looks even more courageous. He is not trivializing what lies ahead. But neither does he surrender his inner freedom to the powers that seek to destroy him.
Paul McGhee, who studied the development of humor across the lifespan, suggests that humor reveals cognitive flexibility and emotional resilience. To get a joke, to make a joke, you have to be able to hold multiple perspectives at once and to pivot between them. You cannot be rigid and deeply humorous at the same time. When we listen to Jesus as a storyteller—his riddles, his quick retorts, his playful parables—we are listening to an extraordinarily agile mind. Humor in this sense is a sign of mental and spiritual suppleness.
Cognitive scientists have also described humor as a kind of “cognitive jolt.” A joke shakes the mind out of its settled patterns, forcing a reframe. That too describes much of Jesus’ teaching ministry. People come expecting platitudes; they receive paradox. They bring questions designed to trap; he answers with a parable that leaves them exposed. The humor is not ornamental. It is part of the way he breaks open the imagination so that people can see what they have never seen before.
Anthropologists and sociologists remind us that humor is never just an individual phenomenon. Jokes create and reveal communities. Mary Douglas, for instance, argues that humor is one way societies police their boundaries. Laughing together tells us who “we” are and, sometimes, who we are not. Humor can enforce norms—and also challenge them. When we watch Jesus at table, when he tells stories about Samaritans and sinners and widows outwitting the great, we are seeing humor deployed to redraw the map of belonging. He uses playful, often outrageous images to question who is “in” and who is “out.”
Victor Turner’s work on liminality—the “in-between” spaces of social life—is also suggestive. Humor tends to flourish where structures are loosening, where hierarchies are not yet reformed. Jesus spends most of his ministry in such spaces: on the road, by the lakeshore, in the countryside, at impromptu meals. In those in-between places, his humor helps to create what Turner calls communitas—a sense of deep, egalitarian fellowship that cuts across the usual social lines.
Peter Berger goes so far as to call humor a “signal of transcendence.” By that he means that genuine humor hints at another order of meaning beyond the one that currently binds us. A joke exposes the absurdity of what we have taken for granted, and for a moment we sense that things could be otherwise. In that sense, Jesus’ humor is profoundly eschatological. It is the sound of the kingdom knocking on the door of the present order.
Literary and linguistic theorists come at these matters from yet another angle. Mikhail Bakhtin wrote about the “carnivalesque”—that festival space in which the usual hierarchies are inverted, the mighty are lampooned, and the lowly are lifted up. Carnival, for him, is not just about foolishness; it is about imagining an alternative world. Many of Jesus’ parables function as holy carnival. Fools become wise, the poor are blessed, beggars are carried by angels while the rich man finds himself in torment. It is not comedy for its own sake. It is comedy in the service of God’s great reversal.
Northrop Frye, reflecting on the deep structures of narrative, notes that comedy is the mythic mode of renewal and restoration. Comedies, in the classical sense, end not with the hero’s death but with reconciliations, marriages, feasts—a world set right. That vision, too, resonates with the Gospel. The story of Jesus moves through tragedy, certainly, but it does not end there. The resurrection is, among many other things, the ultimate comic turn: death itself, the most serious thing we know, is robbed of its final word.
Henri Bergson suggests that we laugh when living beings act mechanically, rigidly, like machines. There is something comic about watching someone so locked into a role or rule that they no longer respond as a living person. Jesus’ harshest humor is often aimed at just that kind of rigidity. He calls the Pharisees “whitewashed tombs” and speaks of people who honor God with their lips while their hearts are far away. From a Bergsonian perspective, that is not mere insult; it is diagnosis. When religion becomes ossified, it becomes almost absurd—and Jesus names that absurdity out loud.
More recent philosophers have tried to take humor with full existential seriousness. Simon Critchley sees humor as a form of ethical wakefulness. A good joke can reveal the truth about us, often more quickly than an argument. It can show us what we have been unwilling to admit. Much of Jesus’ humor has exactly that quality. He does not simply tell people, “You are hypocrites.” He tells them a story about a man with a log in his eye trying to pick a speck out of his brother’s. We laugh, and in the laughter we suddenly see ourselves.
Alenka Zupančič, working in a very different philosophical tradition, argues that jokes can expose what she calls “the Real”—the deeper, often unacknowledged realities beneath our neat stories. Again, that has resonance with Jesus’ parables. They seem simple, even charming, until the moment they turn and reveal something we would rather not see: our attachment to wealth, our fear of grace, our reluctance to come to the banquet.
John Morreall, one of the leading contemporary philosophers of humor, emphasizes play, flexibility, and emotional freedom. Humor, in his view, helps us avoid being trapped in one rigid frame of reference. It makes it possible to hold our convictions with a certain lightness, even as we take them seriously. Jesus’ humor constantly invites people into that kind of freedom. He reorients their loyalties from fear and status to trust in God, and sometimes the doorway into that reorientation is a joke.
Within the explicitly theological world, a few voices are especially helpful for our purposes. Elton Trueblood, in his book The Humor of Christ, complained that many interpreters of Scripture had been too solemn to notice just how funny Jesus can be. Out of reverence, they flattened his speech. Trueblood tried to draw attention back to the wit that was always there—in the exaggerations, the wordplay, the absurd images, the ironic exchanges.
G. K. Chesterton, in his usual exuberant way, suggested that joy is “the gigantic secret of the Christian.” He imagined that there is in God something like a hidden laughter, a delight, that we only dimly perceive. In that light, Jesus’ humor is not a distraction from his holiness; it is one expression of it. Holiness, in this view, is not grim. It is deeply alive.
So, what do we see when we step back from this gallery of theories and thinkers and look again at the figure standing there in the center: Jesus of Nazareth? We can say, first, that his humor is not accidental. The kind of speech we see in the Gospels—parables with a twist, quick rejoinders to trick questions, playful images—requires mastery of language and profound psychological insight. He knows how people think, where they hide, what they fear. His humor meets them there.
We can also say that his humor is morally grounded. Against Hobbes and Plato’s fears, he does not laugh in order to humiliate. When he laughs, it is never at the expense of those without power. His sharpest lines are reserved for those whose religious or social standing has become a weapon against the weak.
His humor is liberating. Freud, Frankl, Morreall and others help us see laughter as a form of freedom, and Jesus’ laughter—explicit or implicit—has that quality. It breaks the spell of other powers. It loosens the grip of fear, shame, and fatalism. It tells us, in effect, that the world as it is does not have to be the world as it will be.
His humor is revelatory. Berger and Critchley and Zupančič all insist that humor unveils truth, and that is exactly how Jesus’ “funny” sayings operate. The joke is often the crack through which the light of the kingdom shines.
His humor, moreover, is psychologically whole. There is nothing of the sadist or the cynic in him. He can name the darkness without becoming dark. He can speak of his own suffering with honesty, and still find room for irony and even play. That combination is rare.
Finally, his humor makes God’s reign visible. The incongruity at the heart of a good joke is, in his case, the incongruity between our expectations and God’s generosity, our hierarchies and God’s mercy, our calculations and God’s wild grace. To laugh with Jesus—not at others, but at our own pretensions and at the smallness of our expectations—may be one way of stepping, however lightly, toward the kingdom.
What might this mean for us as the church? One way to put it is to say that healthy humor can be a spiritual discipline. It helps us hold our convictions without self-righteousness. It reminds us that we are creatures, not creators. It keeps us from confusing ourselves with God. It can even help us bear suffering without despair.
It also suggests that we ought to be careful with the kind of humor we cultivate. There is humor that corrodes, that delights in mocking the weak, that makes cynicism feel clever. That is not the humor of Christ. Christian humor, if we can use that phrase, will be cruciform—shaped by compassion, willing to laugh at ourselves but not at another’s wound.
At the same time, we should not underestimate humor as a doorway to imagination. Sometimes we cannot see the truth until we have first laughed at the lie. A good joke can puncture an idol. A parable with a twist can reveal the hollowness of what we had assumed was solid. In that sense, humor is one of the tools the Spirit may use to renew the church’s mind.
Perhaps, then, part of our vocation is to recover this dimension of the Gospel. To notice when Jesus is being funny. To let ourselves smile at the image of a man with a plank in his eye, or a camel trying to squeeze through the eye of a needle, or a judge who only does the right thing because a widow will not stop pounding on his door. To feel, in that smile, the gentle pressure of the kingdom.
There is an old suggestion, half-serious, that in the resurrection, when all is made new, we may discover that the first sound we hear in the life of the world to come is the sound of God laughing—not in derision, but in delight. A laughter of welcome. A laughter that says, “Look what love has done.” If there is any truth in that, then perhaps Jesus’ earthly humor is a kind of advance echo of that joy.
May that echo be heard among us. May we learn to recognize, beneath his parables and his sayings, the quiet laughter of grace. And may our own laughter—kind, truthful, compassionate—bear witness to the God who, in Christ, has already begun to overturn the grave with something like a smile.
_________________
OUTLINE
Many major theorists across philosophy, psychology, linguistics, anthropology, sociology, and literary theory have developed influential accounts of humor and joking. Below is a concise survey of some of the most significant figures for framing Jesus’ humor.
I will list them by category and give a brief statement of their relevance.
I. Classical and Philosophical Foundations
1. Aristotle – The Ethics and Rhetoric
• Discusses eutrapelia (wittiness) as a virtue: the middle between boorishness and buffoonery.
• Humor as a social good, requiring moderation, timing, and respect.
Relevance: Jesus’ humor demonstrates moral clarity and appropriateness.
2. Plato
• Suspicious of humor as rooted in mockery, superiority, and self-deception.
Relevance: Provides a foil—Jesus never uses humor to demean, so he transcends Plato’s critique.
II. Classical Humor Theories (Three Major Ones)
1. Superiority Theory – Hobbes
• Laughter arises from feeling superior (“a sudden glory”).
Relevance: Jesus’ humor does not align with this; his humor does not belittle.
2. Relief Theory – Freud
• Humor releases psychic tension.
Relevance: Already explored; helps illuminate Jesus’ psychological integration.
3. Incongruity Theory – Kant & Schopenhauer
• Humor arises from the clash between expectation and reality.
Relevance: Jesus’ parables and reversals (“the last shall be first,” mustard seed becomes a tree) thrive on incongruity.
III. Modern Psychological and Cognitive Theorists
1. Viktor Frankl
• Humor as the final weapon of the soul—claiming inner freedom in suffering.
Relevance: Illuminates Jesus’ dark humor on the road to the cross.
2. Paul McGhee
• Developmental psychology of humor.
• Humor as cognitive flexibility and emotional resilience.
Relevance: Jesus shows remarkable mental agility and emotional strength.
3. Marvin Minsky & Cognitive Scientists
• Humor as a kind of cognitive “jolt,” revealing the brain’s pattern-making.
Relevance: Riddles and hyperbole in Jesus’ teaching work exactly this way.
IV. Anthropologists and Sociologists of Humor
1. Mary Douglas
• Humor as a form of boundary-policing and category disruption.
Relevance: Jesus’ humor repeatedly disrupts expected social and religious categories.
2. Victor Turner
• Humor in liminality; jokes create communitas and re-order hierarchies.
Relevance: Jesus’ humor often arises in liminal spaces (meals, roads, fields).
3. Peter Berger
• Humor as a theological gesture—pointing to the transcendent by revealing the absurdity of the human condition.
Relevance: Jesus’ humor often reveals the gap between human expectation and divine reality.
V. Literary and Linguistic Theorists
1. Mikhail Bakhtin
• Carnivalesque humor: destabilizing power, leveling hierarchies, creating alternative realities.
Relevance: Jesus’ parables contain “holy carnival”: the kingdom inverts the world’s order.
2. Northrop Frye
• Humor as one of the mythic modes; comic vision reflects transformation and renewal.
Relevance: Jesus’ humor participates in God’s comic reversal (death-to-life).
3. Henri Bergson
• Humor as “mechanical behavior encrusted on the living”—comic when people act rigidly.
Relevance: Jesus’ ridicule of rigid legalism (“whitewashed tombs”) fits Bergson exactly.
VI. Contemporary Philosophers of Humor
1. Simon Critchley
• Humor as a form of ethical wakefulness; jokes reveal existential truth.
Relevance: Connects directly to Jesus’ humor as a mode of spiritual awakening.
2. Alenka Zupančič
• Humor as philosophical disruption; jokes reveal the Real.
Relevance: Jesus’ parables and reversals expose the “Real” of God’s reign.
3. John Morreall
• Major contemporary theorist; humor as play, cognitive shift, and emotional freedom.
Relevance: Jesus’ humor invites a playful, liberated engagement with reality.
VII. Pastoral and Theological Voices
1. Elton Trueblood – The Humor of Christ
• Classic work asserting that Jesus’ humor has been overlooked by interpreters.
Relevance: Provides theological grounding for teaching on Jesus’ wit.
2. G. K. Chesterton
• Humor as theological insight: joy is the gigantic secret of the Christian.
Relevance: His insights help frame humor as integral to Christian revelation.
VIII. What These Theorists Collectively Reveal About Jesus
1. Jesus’ humor is not accidental.
It reflects deep mastery of human cognition, emotion, and social dynamics.
2. Jesus’ humor is morally grounded.
Unlike Hobbesian humor, it does not demean.
3. Jesus’ humor is liberating.
Freud, Frankl, and Morreall all help us see it as releasing, freeing, clarifying.
4. Jesus’ humor is revelatory.
Berger, Critchley, and Bakhtin point out that humor exposes hidden truths—perfect description of Jesus’ parables.
5. Jesus’ humor is psychologically whole.
Freud, McGhee, and Frankl together show that Jesus displays emotional integration, not fragmentation.
6. Jesus’ humor makes the kingdom visible.
Incongruity theorists (Kant, Schopenhauer) show how Jesus uses surprise to unveil divine reality.
Comments